HP3000-L Archives

September 1998, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Glenn Cole <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sun, 20 Sep 1998 16:34:01 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Item Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] Redirecting the STDIN source?
Lars gives an example of a job that contains a "feature" I've been
wondering about lately:

> !job myslt,manager.sys
> !print > indfile
>  @[log in to unmask]; directory; progress; compress
>  @[log in to unmask]
> !eod
[snip]

I guess my question really involves only "form" rather than "substance."

Anyway, which is "proper" to include in a job stream:

        !eod
     or :eod
?

Yes, I understand "!eod" gets translated to ":eod" so there's "really"
no difference, but "!eod" just doesn't feel right.

I mean, neither :EOD nor :EOF: are actually "MPE commands," right?
(Hmmm, I just noticed that EOD is in the 5.0 commands manual with
the other commands, but :EOF: is not.)

Just wondering...

--Glenn "also wondering how one grows seedless grapes" Cole
  Software al dente, Inc.
  [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2