HP3000-L Archives

September 1998, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: And speaking of Benchmarks. . .
From:
Dirickson Steve <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Dirickson Steve <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Sep 1998 11:10:59 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines) 
        <<According to my InformationWeek Daily email, "HP Guarantees 99.9%
Availability On Windows NT Systems". As in uptime, not how long it takes to
get one after you order it. While a good thing for our NT needs, I cannot
imagine this for the 3000. Unless you are trying to sell one. Now there's a
thought.>>


8 hours 46 minutes of unplanned downtime a year? Every year? I don't think
we've ever had a 3000 be down that much, even going back to the 58 ten years
ago; three-nines uptime would be a big step backward.

Steve

ATOM RSS1 RSS2