Allow me to correct point # 2 of my previous message with the
following:
2. The not "operating system-agnostic" stance appears two faced.
Saying that HP has an opinion about the most appropriate OS for a
given situation but then consistently not naming only some of options
seems inconsistant. The appearance again is that HP has an opinion
as long as the options are limited to
HP-UX, Linux, or NT. What about MPE/iX? From the comments one
doesn't know.