And if said President fails the level two years in a
row then maybe automatic dismissal as not worthy of
the office?

--- Bruce Collins <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> John Clogg wrote:
> > What is the solution, then?  Public schools are
> required to accept any 
> > student.
> 
> Perhaps you need to adopt a "No Presidents Left
> Behind" Policy :-)
> 
>
http://www.avantnews.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=328
> 
> Here's an excerpt:
> "
> A key provision of No President Left Behind is the
> requirement that the 
> office of the presidency develop a collection of
> assessments, policy success 
> rates, and other indicators on which presidential
> performance can be judged. 
> Presidents will be required to meet Adequate Yearly
> Progress (AYP) levels 
> across the range of indicators, cross-referenced
> with goals as announced in 
> campaign appearances, State of the Union speeches,
> and other public events.
> 
> Presidents who fail to meet AYP levels, to be
> externally assessed though a 
> rigorous NPLB annual testing program, are considered
> to have "fallen short", 
> which then qualifies the failing president for
> additional assistance in the 
> form of better advisors, better policies, and, in
> extreme cases, remedial 
> education.
> "
> 
> Bruce
> 
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change
> list settings, *
> * etc., please visit
> http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
> 


John Bawden
Homestead3000 Consulting
[log in to unmask]

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *