Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 30 Nov 1998 15:27:56 GMT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Wed, 25 Nov 1998 10:57:12 -0500, "Trudeau, James L"
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Howdy,
>
>*My* dummy question for the day:
>
>On Tuesday, November 24, 1998 11:42 PM, Richard D Ingham
>[SMTP:[log in to unmask]] wrote:>
><snip stuff incomprehensible to us southern types>
>
>> Since one of the things we will need is simple object storage, with single
>> key look up and no extra search ability required, I really like the idea
>of
>> a degenerate IMAGE data base. It's damn reliable and efficient for direct
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> A whut?
>
I would guess a schema with all stand-alone datasets, or maybe even
just one stand-alone master.
---
Mark Landin "For anyone who was never good at
T. D. Williamson, Inc. anything, technology has been a
UNIX Sys. Admin real boon" --- my mom
|
|
|