Tony Furnivall ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
 
> Thanks for your blast-o-gram. The whole intent is to GATHER the content. As
> these issues are received they frquently come in with a sparse definition. We
> wanted to tap the collective wisdom of you all to see just what the request
> might be about.
 
I'm not sure you got Steve's point about stuffing everying in the subject
line rather than in the message text.  I too use rtin (newsreader) and
many of your subject lines were truncated to the point where they didn't
make any sense.
 
I found that I could read the entire subject line by doing a followup
(but not actually posting the message) so I could read the header within
the text editor (which doesn't truncate).
 
No offense meant here.  Just though you'd like to know for future reference.
 
  Jeff Lindberg, Data Processing Coordinator
 
---
Mississippi Bend Area Education Agency     ([log in to unmask])
729 21st Street Bettendorf, IA  52722
 "I am Homer of Borg.  Prepare to be assimilat... Oooo, Donuts!"