Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 4 May 1996 17:40:42 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Sat, 4 May 1996, Ken Hirsch wrote:
> Some things I have heard about UNIX:
> (1) Crashes more often.
> Which versions? Can you quantify this (MTBF)?
> Interestingly, I have heard that Linux (a free Unix)
> is very stable.
Not a chance. Linux is decent for starting out, but experience
has taught me not to risk my neck on it anymore. FreeBSD seems to be
much better, and actually complies to a standard, BSD 4.4.
> (2) Uses more resources - memory and CPU.
> I know most Unix programs tend to have
> character-by-character interfaces or GUI
> interfaces while MPE programs tend to
> be block-mode or line-mode. Are there
> other reasons why Unix uses more system
> resources?
System resource utilization depends on the architecture and
design of the OS. DEC Alpha and OSF/1 are horrible and bloated when it
comes to memory usage. MPE _can_ be a memory hog as well, while SunOS and
other BSD's seem to be fairly decent when it comes to memory management.
Daniel Kosack
[log in to unmask]
-- My opinions are my own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of
my employers at FredNet or the National Cancer Institute FCRDC.
|
|
|