Earlier today I posted:

> (9)    Last (for now) but certainly not least (drum roll):
> All be advised that THE ENCHILADA LIVES !!!!....
> .....
> competing proposals were passed on to the HP R&D Database Lab:
>
>   [a]   A separate database or databases:           2 votes.
>   [b]   An external-to-database PRIVileged file:    1 vote.
>   [c]   A "veiled" / partially hidden dataset:         4 votes.
>   [d]   Expand the current IMAGE root file:         10 votes.
>
> ..... a vote of the attending membership in Chicago....  Results:
>
>    [a]   Zero votes.
>    [b]   Zero votes.
>    [c]   One vote.
>    [d]   Everybody else (about 30 people left at time of this vote).

The person who cast the single dissenting vote in Chicago was kind
enough to gently correct my grievous error:   The "one vote" was for
choice [a] - A separate database or databases;  NOT for [c] - A
partially hidden dataset.  So last 4 lines above SHOULD HAVE read:

    [a]   ONE vote.
    [b]   Zero votes.
    [c]   Zero votes.
    [d]   Everybody else (about 30 people left at time of this vote).

Mea culpa, mea culpa:  Trying to do too many things at once at the
meeting (and whatever other worthless excuses I can come up with).

Thank you to that one dissenting voter for setting me straight,

Ken Sletten
SIGImage/SQL Chair

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *