HP3000-L Archives

October 1998, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Denys Beauchemin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sun, 18 Oct 1998 20:31:16 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
X-no-Archive:yes
Nick writ:
Huh?  I worked on one in the late 70's and 80's.  Of course, it wasn't
called a classeic then - these were called classics only later in
comparison to the RISC
machines, but if one of them was running today (a series III) it
would be called a "classic".

My point exactly.  When I started working on a Series II then III, then a
33 and so on, they were not called 3000 classic.  They were called HP 3000
minicomputers.  Or maybe my memory is failing me. :)

Kind regards,

Denys. . .

Denys Beauchemin
HICOMP America, Inc.
(800) 323-8863  (281) 288-7438         Fax: (281) 355-6879
denys at hicomp.com                             www.hicomp.com


-----Original Message-----
From:   Nick Demos [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent:   Sunday, 18 October, 1998 5:01 PM
To:     [log in to unmask]
Subject:        Re: Basic Timesharing/3000 clones?

Denys
>
> Nitpicking issue.  There was no such thing as a 3000 Classic back in the
> 70's and early 80's.  :)
>
>

Regards,

Nick

ATOM RSS1 RSS2