HP3000-L Archives

July 1999, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nick Demos <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Nick Demos <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 22 Jul 1999 18:37:38 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Joe Geiser wrote:
>
> Jim Phillips writes,
>
>
> It's 6 of one, half-dozen of the other - either way, you have
> trouble.  You could end up with a new area code, or forced into
> 10-digit dialing, or both.
>
> Baltimore was the first, I believe, to go to 10-digit dialing several
> years ago, much to the chagrin of the folks who lived there.
> Philadelphia and the surrounding areas (Area Codes 215 and 610) went
> mandatory 10-digit dialing on June 5 of this year, and certain area
> codes in New Jersey go mandatory in the next several months.
>
Not really.  The first areas where 10 digit dialing was required
were
places like Washington, DC, where you had to dial into different
Utility Commisions' jurisdictions (states) but the you could do
it
without a long distance charge, e, g., area code 202 (DC), part
of
301 (Maryland) and 703 (part of Virginia).

Nick D.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2