Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 5 Nov 2002 21:36:44 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Wirt said:
That isn't true of course. The Republicans take in far more money than do
the
Democrats. It's just that the Democrats don't have very many "fat cats,"
thus
they must depend on donations made from organizations, most of which are
labor unions, and which are the basis of Ken's list.
Wirt, how about Hollywood? One of the blips that went by on my radar was an
appeal by the DNC for an immediate need of $15 million, and 3 Hollywood
millionaires filled the gap. One of the people was the guy who got Liz
Hurley pregnant (Bing?) Forget the other 2.
I guess what really gets me cynical in politics is knowing a lot of
companies/groups give to **both** candidates so influence will be "assured".
Bill
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|