HP3000-L Archives

November 2002, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Brandt <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Bill Brandt <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 5 Nov 2002 21:36:44 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Wirt said:
        That isn't true of course. The Republicans take in far more money than do
the
        Democrats. It's just that the Democrats don't have very many "fat cats,"
thus
        they must depend on donations made from organizations, most of which are
        labor unions, and which are the basis of Ken's list.

Wirt, how about Hollywood? One of the blips that went by on my radar was an
appeal by the DNC for an immediate need of $15 million, and 3 Hollywood
millionaires filled the gap. One of the people was the guy who got Liz
Hurley pregnant (Bing?) Forget the other 2.

I guess what really gets me cynical in politics is knowing a lot of
companies/groups give to **both** candidates so influence will be "assured".

Bill

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2