HP3000-L Archives

October 1997, Week 5

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Marco A. Zamora" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Marco A. Zamora
Date:
Thu, 30 Oct 1997 09:02:36 -0600
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (27 lines)
On Wed, 29 Oct 1997, F. Alfredo Rego wrote:
> From Reuters:
> PITTSBURGH -- Trying to prevent massive computer problems when the year 2000
> arrives, government information officers yesterday adopted a new standard for
> representing the year in computer systems.
> At a one-day summit in Pittsburgh, chief information officers from 40 states
> and 22 federal agencies adopted a new date identification code.
> At a news conference after the summit, Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge told
> reporters that officials had agreed to use four digits to identify the year
> in all state and federal agency computers.

Did it really take a "summit" to have them all agree to using 4-digit years?
Tax dollars at work...

> Everyone at Adager is thrilled to be an integral part of this massive
> effort (which, by the way, extends well beyond the U.S. borders).

You can tell me :). Right now all financial institutions in Mexico have at
least 3 different auditors (the central bank, the corresponding regulatory
comission --such as the equivalent of the SEC--, and the internal auditors) on
top of Y2K. (I'm happy to say that the new, in-house-developed systems we
rolled out a year ago are totally Y2K problem-free.)

Some big consultancy firms are making a *lot* of money out of this.

Cheers...                       Marco Zamora

ATOM RSS1 RSS2