Well said, Jim.
I would add this, from an outsider's perspective; it appears as
though HP has not been on the front edge of technology, but rather on
the trailing edge. That's not your fault, but I would say it's
senior leadership's fault. Jumping on bandwagons late (PCs, tablets,
even consulting solutions were late in arriving) is not
innovative. Some MAJOR DOLLAR acquisitions have gone very sour. And
I believe that giving up on MPE and the 3000 platform was a mistake
(from what I can tell, the IBM iSeries...fka AS400...appears to be thriving).
I hope that HP can get back to blazing new trails to the future.
Respectfully,
John Lee
At 12:36 PM 06/04/2013, Hawkins, Jim (ESSN TCE&Q) wrote:
>John,
>
>You raise very good questions which I would summarize as: 'what is
>"real" innovation?' Different people have different ideas. As
>others point out some great HP products like Calculators, LaserJets,
>HP 3000, along with non-HP products like iPod or iPhone all were
>unique implementations of 99% existing technology. So who gets
>credit for 'the invention' IS often down to packaging and marketing.
>
>Just a couple of weeks ago I had a chance to go to a poster fair of
>HP Labs research products. There were some really cool things like
>a no-glasses 3-d display and a method to determine co-location of
>devices without GPS or WiFi location information or any
>communication between the two devices (I'll leave you to ponder that*).
>
>At the same time there were lots of other stuff which looked vaguely
>familiar to someone who's been in commercial computing for a
>while -- ways to handling the change in the amount of data (tera,
>exa, penta byte data sets), structure unstructured data, reduce
>impact of the mis-match between CPU->Memory->secondary
>storage. What about a system with memristor memory which could be
>permanent and as fast as your CPU, how can you scale with 1000s of
>CPUs, where are the next bottle necks coming, what kind of file
>system do you need (no-caching, pre-fetch or other tricks needed)???
>
>At the poster board level it is sometimes hard to see the meat to
>judge what exactly is new there but given the number of PhD's and
>'patent' granted/pending references I trust that there is something
>which is pushing boundaries at some level.
>
>Similarly unless you've actually evaluated the Sun/IBM/HP non-x86
>compacted blade solutions it may be hard to see from marketing
>materials exactly what is unique -- that is more a problem of
>marketing, less of innovation.
>
>Respectfully,
>
>Jim
>
>* They use audio from device microphones to establish a pattern of
>-- background silence -- which is apparently better than the
>background noise [think two people listing to the same radio station
>in different locations]. That pattern information would be shared on
>a server and help you meet-up with people close by. . .
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
>Behalf Of John Lee
>Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 11:07 AM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] Maybe this is why HP is down in the dumps
>
>Thanks for the links, Jim. I perused them both, and I learned some
>things. It appears as though Moonshot is a shrunken blade
>server. And reducing power consumption and footprint is
>important...it saves money and resources. But aren't Sun and IBM
>promoting the same? It was difficult to tell what was innovative,
>unique or patentable about Moonshot. I'm not being critical, I'm
>giving a layman's opinion. HP looks the same as everyone else.
>
>Same with the SDN solution...I get product literature from IBM and
>they make the same claims. Again, I'm not being critical or
>questionning your product knowledge. I just find it hard to see
>what differentiates HP. So then does it just become a marketing
>game? Everyone is selling the same solutions, but who is better at
>selling? Who's got more contacts in high places? Who is better at
>retaining customers?
>
>John Lee
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>At 11:47 AM 06/03/2013, Hawkins, Jim (ESSN TCE&Q) wrote:
> >The hURD removed Invent from the logo and slashed
> >R&D. Non-the-less HP is still inventing and you don't have to look
> >very hard to find lots of stuff which is new and industry leading. . .
> >
> >http://h30507.www3.hp.com/t5/HP-Networking/HP-Networking-SDN-solution-w
> >on-the-2013-Innovations-award/ba-p/139503
> >
> >http://h17007.www1.hp.com/us/en/enterprise/servers/products/moonshot/in
> >dex.aspx
> >
> >HP Discover is next week in Las Vegas -- my understanding is that
> >CNBC will be broadcasting live from the floor. If you want to
> >learn what HP is really up to there's a good chance.
> >
> >Jim
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
> >Behalf Of Denys Beauchemin
> >Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 9:11 AM
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] Maybe this is why HP is down in the dumps
> >
> >I believe the pharmacist or his predecessor removed the Invent
> from the logo.
> >
> >Denys
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
> >Behalf Of Michael Berkowitz
> >Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 10:49 AM
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] Maybe this is why HP is down in the dumps
> >
> >Impossible. Doesn't the logo still say "HP" / Invent?
> >
> >Michael Berkowitz
> >Project Manager, CGS Application Solutions
> >5530 Corbin Ave Suite 313
> >Tarzana, CA 91356-6033
> >Direct: 818 635-0816
> >Message: 212 261-9610
> >Fax: 646 710-1889
> >[log in to unmask]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >From: John Lee <[log in to unmask]>
> >To: [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
> >Date: 06/03/2013 08:45 AM
> >Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] Maybe this is why HP is down in the dumps
> >
> >
> >
> >When was the last time HP introduced something innovative to the tech
> >world? I'm not being sarcastic, I'm serious...they stopped innovating.
> >Weren't the 1000 and 3000 product lines full of solutions for end users
> >back in the day? Where has that gone? Was the LaserJet their last
> >patent? Maybe I'm missing some but I don't see it.
> >
> >John Lee
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >It's a Friday afternoon and for some reason I googled Jeff Vance whom
> > >we all have worked with previously. First up is linkedin. So I go
> > >to the webpage, find that he's working for Red Hat, but also notice
> > >the "people also viewed" column on the far right. Lots of names from
> > >the past
> > >
> > >Mike Paivinen
> > >Scott McClellan
> > >Becky McBride
> > >Craig Fairchild
> > >Steve Macsisak
> > >Stephen Watt
> > >
> > >Of that group, including Jeff, only 2 are at HP (Becky and Craig),
> > >the company they might have thought they'd be employed for life
> > >
> > >Michael Berkowitz
> > >Project Manager, CGS Application Solutions
> > >5530 Corbin Ave Suite 313
> > >Tarzana, CA 91356-6033
> > >Direct: 818 635-0816
> > >Message: 212 261-9610
> > >Fax: 646 710-1889
> > >[log in to unmask]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >NOTICE OF COMPANY CONFIDENTIALITY
> > >This e-mail, and any attachment to it, contains company confidential
> > >and/or privileged information intended only for the use of the
> > >individual(s) named on the e-mail. If you are not the intended
> > >recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or
> > >distribution of this information or the taking of any action in
> > >reliance on the contents of this e-mail transmission is strictly
> > >prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify
> > >the sender by telephone immediately, and/or immediately return it to
> > >the sender, and delete it from your system.
> > >Thank you for your cooperation.
> > >
> > >* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> > >* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >NOTICE OF COMPANY CONFIDENTIALITY
> >This e-mail, and any attachment to it, contains company confidential
> >and/or privileged information intended only for the use of the
> >individual(s) named on the e-mail. If you are not the intended
> >recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or
> >distribution of this information or the taking of any action in
> >reliance on the contents of this e-mail transmission is strictly
> >prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify
> >the sender by telephone immediately, and/or immediately return it to
> >the sender, and delete it from your system.
> >Thank you for your cooperation.
> >
> >* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> >* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
> >
> >* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> >* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
> >
> >* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> >* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>
>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
