HP3000-L Archives

October 1997, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kevin L. Newman" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 15 Oct 1997 09:54:29 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
Uh, no.  10.02.

It seems that the problem is a stub in the account level XL.  If I run it as:
RUN TTEST;XL='XL.PUB.SYS', everything is fine, but since all of my subroutines
are in the local XL, I have to run as: RUN TTEST;XL='XL.PUB'.

I know, try this:  RUN TTEST;XL='XL.PUB.SYS,XL.PUB'

No, it blows up and gives me errors.

I'm waiting on HP to call me back so that I might be able to find, and eliminate
the stub in the local xl.  It seems that before I got here, and before my boss
was involved with things, the programmer/system manager somehow got the stub
into the local xl, then in 1992, when the changes were made to Transact, the
system XL got the update, but the junk in the local XL is still there.

I'm also looking into building a new xl and re-compiling all of my sub-programs
into it.

Kevin


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: HELP!!!  Transact and the year 2000!
Author:  Nick Demos <[log in to unmask]> at trcinternet
Date:    10/14/97 11:39 PM


>Kevin N. writes:

> I was just compiling some code with the list option of: date/c.
>
> I got: 101497, not the 19971014 that I was expecting.

You must have an old version of transact.  I have version 10.01 and
it gives me 19971014, as expected.  Had this version for at least
three years.

Nick Demos  [log in to unmask]
My opinions are ny own and I stand behind them.

Performance Software Group
Tel. (410) 788-6777 Fax (410) 788-4476

ATOM RSS1 RSS2