Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 19 Jan 2000 08:07:19 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 04:54 PM 1/15/2000 -0800, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>The original question was about 989 class of machines and problems. But,
>since we're going deeper ...
>
>Backup+ also tends to run into these system limitations. (Should I put a
><plug> alert here? :-) These aren't hardware specific, but it is quite
>true that the faster hardware will allow them to manifest much quicker.
<plug>(alert to be safe..) Since implementing new technology in DBGeneral
which significantly enhances performance, we too have encountered similar
scenarios during testing and have worked with HP to address them. From our
perspective the situations don't appear to be hardware specific, but rather
more closely associated with complex software designs which maximize the use
of the hardware to achieve the highest possible performance. In doing
so, the tiniest possible window can be exposed which may not have
previously been identified.
</plug>
/jf
_\\///_
(' o-o ')
___________________________ooOo_( )_OOoo____________________________________
Wednesday, January 19th
Today in 1807 - Robert E. Lee was born.
___________________________________Oooo_____________________________________
oooO ( )
( ) ) /
\ ( (_/
\_)
|
|
|