HP3000-L Archives

May 1998, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Sletten Kenneth W <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Sletten Kenneth W <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 13 May 1998 10:39:58 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
John after Shawn:

>> We've noticed an odd trend lately, there is a number of
>> system processes that are taking a rather large amount of
>> CPU.

> I noticed this same thing when I updated to PP3. It seemed to
> be the SQE switch on transceivers to DTC's was not on.

Not only CPU activity:  If the SQE heartbeat on the 10BaseT
transceiver is not on, believe you will also get a high level of disc
I/O, because the system wants to log each of these "events".
When we first switched from 10Base2 to 10BaseT and hooked
up a DTC, we immediately started seeing a continuous 70-80
I/O's per second.  Eventually got around to doing a

LINKCONTROL @; STATUS = ALL

and noticed we had millions of heartbeat losses recorded since
last reset.  Turned on transceiver SQE heartbeat and all was well..

Ken Sletten

ATOM RSS1 RSS2