Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 28 Mar 2000 10:54:44 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
If you are talking for COBOL, then TRAX from CCS is the best product out
there. For C, XDB works just fine.
At 10:50 AM 3/28/2000, Chuck Ryan wrote:
>I purchased the HP symbolic debugger... and I definitely would NOT classify
>it as good... it works (barely) but is extremely limited and stepping is
>very slow. It can also completely lock on Initialize statements.
>
>Any subprograms you wish to debug must be linked into the executable, you
>cannot step into an XL.
>
>Also, I have not found a way to step over a performed paragraph, which means
>I must set many intermediate breakpoints or step through every paragraph.
>
>If you find a decent product, let me know.... I very much regret buying the
>HP product.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mark Boyd [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2000 12:04 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Symbolic debugger for hp.
>
>
>Anyone know of a good symbolic debugger for the hp?
|
|
|