HP3000-L Archives

July 2002, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Wayne R. Boyer" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
[log in to unmask][log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *36_3Jul200214:50:[log in to unmask]
Date:
Wed, 3 Jul 2002 13:10:57 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
In a message dated 7/3/02 8:17:52 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:


> Accident of birth is not correct.  Many people did (and still do) come to
> the U.S. to give birth to their children, so that their children are then
> citizens of the U.S.
>
>

US rules for citizenship and immigration are a bizarre mess.  This is just
one of the dumb things about it.  Where a woman gives birth to a baby makes a
difference in the baby's citizenship.

Wouldn't it make much more sense to say "children of US citizens are US
citizens and children on non-US citizens and also non-US citizens"?

Dare I mention how this ties in to the H1B program?  How about the differing
rules for different nationalities?  Accepted but illegal aliens?

Wayne Boyer

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2