Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:45:32 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:11:51 -0500, Tom Brandt <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> From the NY Times:
>==================================================================
>
>
>High - Tech Jobs Dwindle by 12 Percent
>
>November 19, 2003
> By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
>
>Filed at 12:19 a.m. ET
>
>SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- About 12 percent of the nation's
>high-tech jobs have evaporated during the past two years,
>but the meltdown appears to be in its final stages,
>according to an industry report to be released Wednesday.
>
>Wyoming was the nation's most sparsely populated high-tech
>state, with 4,357 employees in the industry. Wyoming added
>453 high-tech workers in 2002, joining Montana as the only
>states where the industry's payroll increased. Montana
>gained 68 high-tech workers in 2002.
See, I know why I want to move to Wyoming or Montana.
Both are awsome states. So is northern Idaho.
Just beautiful
Michael
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|