Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 2 Oct 1996 09:11:43 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Ed,
One thing you might try is to do only one FCOPY per file.
Maybe something like...
1. FCOPY the disc file to a printer, but leave the spoolfile
deferred.
2. SPOOLF O####.out.hpspool;PRINT;DEV=another-printer. Do this
for each additional copy that you need to send to another
printer. Hopefully, this is faster than additional FCOPYs.
3. SPOOLF O####.out.hpspool;PRI=8 to let the original FCOPYed
report print.
Good luck!
David Maclary
--------------------------
Analog Devices, Inc.
[log in to unmask]
(617) 461-4127
--------------------------
>Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1996 09:59:31 -0700
>From: Ed Uber <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Better method of CCTL printing than FCOPY?
>
>I've just recently started reading this newsgroup, but in a thread
>printed in the September issue of _Interact_, Stan Sieler said:
><snip>
>>yes it's often not appropriate to use FCOPY...Several jobs I support >use
FCOPY
>to print disc files with CCTL.
>Sometimes the same file is FCOPY'd to several printers. For large
>files, this can take a noticeable amount of time. Does anyone have a
>suggestion for a better (faster, or capable of dealing efficiently
>with multiple destinations) MPE command to use? If not, a third party
>utility?
>
>Thanks,
>Ed Uber
>[log in to unmask]
>
>------------------------------
|
|
|