HP3000-L Archives

March 2002, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Baier <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Michael Baier <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 1 Mar 2002 13:41:28 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
Don't you watch Stargate SG-1?
Clear and simple explanation.

Michael

On Fri, 1 Mar 2002 09:31:35 -0800, Guy HPTraderOnline
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>And God commanded, "Go forth and evolve not!"
>
>We only believe we evolved here.  There are very large monuments on Mars
>which could be explained away if looked at individually.  However, they are
>all configured to match our own ancient monuments.
>http://www.planetarymysteries.com/mars/totzek/index.html
>
>Could humans have inhabited Mars first, then Earth? Or maybe a homesteading
>movement like the Oregon, California trail.
>
>Guy
>www.hptraderonline.com
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Steve Dirickson" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 3:52 PM
>Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT: Ohio wants to teach "2001" in 2 002and beyond
>
>
>> > Remember the context of this discussion:  Intelligent design
>> > theory.  It is
>> > the opinion of the author of the web page I cited that
>> > natural selection
>> > performs all the functions of an intelligent designer, which
>> > was formerly
>> > known as God, Christian or otherwise.  In other words, he is
>> > saying that we
>> > have merely swapped one definition of God for another when we
>> propose
>> > natural selection as the the Designer.
>> > ....
>> > In general, theologians have always pondered how we got here
>> > and why we are
>> > here.  These are questions that evolution tries to answer as well.
>>
>> I don't see it. Evolution provides an answer--that appears to be
>> elegant, consistent, and complete--to "how"; I don't see anything
>> anywhere in it that remotely tries to address "why". Which is why this
>> "you must choose God or evolution" thing seems so stupid to me:
>> allowing only one of them means that you'll always be "wrong", because
>> you'll have only part of the answer.
>>
>> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>>
>
>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2