HP3000-L Archives

February 1998, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gavin Scott <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Gavin Scott <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 13 Feb 1998 14:55:22 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Bruce wrote:
> Yes, it's a proof of concept, and the big news is that it runs at room
> temperature. But it was a full PowerPC implementation.

The article Glenn just pointed to claims it lacked an FPU and Memeory
Management support which would be needed to run a real OS on it, and
things like superscalar operation, branch prediction, and out-of-order
execution are also missing which would prevent it from achieving the
relative performance you would expect of a 1Ghz chip.  As the article
points out, adding these things drastically increases chip complexity
and tends to drive clock rates down.

G.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2