HP3000-L Archives

July 2000, Week 5

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Cortlandt Wilson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Cortlandt Wilson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 15:26:28 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
> My boss
> just walked in and said, "email me the advantages of IMAGE over
SQL." <

Without doing a lot of "reading between the lines" and making
assumptions the question is non-sensical.

First the question compares apples and oranges.  Image is a DBMS -
Data Base Management System - like Oracle, Sybase, DB2 etc.    SQL is
a data manipulation, programming, and database specification language.

Second, Image/SQL obviously supports the most used parts of the SQL
standard.   And if you don't like HP's implementation of it there are
three other vendors who have their own SQL to Image utilities.

- Cortlandt

ATOM RSS1 RSS2