HP3000-L Archives

December 2000, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: OT: Microsoft Windows 2000 Advertising
From:
Chuck Ryan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Chuck Ryan <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 13 Dec 2000 13:12:55 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines) 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Phillips [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 11:57 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [HP3000-L] OT: Microsoft Windows 2000 Advertising
>
>
> Now, can someone explain what "13 times more reliable than Windows 98"
> really means?  If Windows 98 crashed 100 times, then I can
> expect Windows
> 2000 to crash 1/13th of that (or 7.7 times)?
>

I'm sorry but... did you just bash MS for ADDING stability to their product?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2