Ray,
The battery really ruins the whole concept.
I don't know, maybe an Ohm meter might have helped prove their point. :-) If there was one.
Just goes to show, some people DO have too much time on their hands.
-Craig
--- On Thu, 12/17/09, Ray Shahan <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
From: Ray Shahan <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: RE: [HP3000-L] OT: Something from nothing
To: "Craig Lalley" <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date: Thursday, December 17, 2009, 8:27 AM
LOL, so they passed up on perpetual motion, and just went for creating more energy than consumed....cute.
"It is controversial because it is an "over-unity" technology, meaning that it produces more energy than it consumes without the degradation of its constituent parts."
-----Original Message-----
From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Craig Lalley
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 11:15 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [HP3000-L] OT: Something from nothing
Who will win? Physics or Orbo?
http://www.steorn.com/news/releases/?id=1161
There is even a live feed at
http://www.steorn.com/orbo
Remember, last time this was a bust.
-Craig
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
