I have a process that is switching from NM-->CM over 4,000 times per second.
This seems a bit excessive.
I did a stack trace and saw the process switching to CM in order to call the
NLCOLLATE intrinsic.
As I understand the NLCOLLATE intrinsic, it is more efficient if the collate
sequence is passed as the 7th parameter. But is still looks like a CM
intrinsic.
Is there a better way to do this? Is there a better intrinsic to choose?
I am wondering if anyone else has run into this.
TIA,
-Craig
I apologise if this post made it to the list earlier this morning, it was
returned to me as a duplicate post?
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *