HP3000-L Archives

January 1999, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Andreas Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 5 Jan 1999 17:14:34 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (70 lines)
Thanks, Patrick, that may be the point: we have older versions:

[100] XEBHH2:arranger.maestro.ccc;info="version"
MAESTRO/ARRANGER D.01.20  (C) Unison Software Inc. 1990
SL: D.01.00 Library - SLPM (C) Unison Software Inc. 1990
SL: D.01.00 Maestro Access (C) Unison Software Inc. 1990
(T) Installed for DuPont de MNemours


[101] XEBHH2:run schedulr.maestro.ccc;info="version"

MAESTRO XL/SCHEDULR D.01.02 (C) Unison Software Inc. 1990
XL: D.01.05 Library - XLAIF30 (C) Unison Software Inc. 1990
XL: D.01.00 Maestro Access (C) Unison Software Inc. 1990
(T) Installed for DuPont de MNemours

END OF PROGRAM

So, I will go at least for an update to Tivoli (having cried enough I got a
 new phone number ...)
and have to wait for a final solution of the Setsym bug.

Thanks to all who responded!

Best regards, Andreas





[log in to unmask] on 01/05/99 04:38:55 PM

Please respond to [log in to unmask]

To:   Andreas Schmidt/HI/CSC
cc:   [log in to unmask]
Subject:  Re: MAESTRO Problems




<skip>
> (2) The LCAL functionality does not work for Y2000:
<skip>
What version are you running? We encountered something similar in that
Arranger's ADTE function told us that 02/29/00 was an invalid date, but
it did take it. And we were able to run SCHEDULR and pull the proper
schedules for that date. We're on version D.01.43 (as reported by
Arranger). We didn't test it with TimeMachine, though, so perhaps the
problem lies with it, not SCHEDULR...
> (3) Reported in the past by Thomas Siebel: SCHEDULR program does not work
> for dates in Y2K using the
<skip>

Again, what version are you on? We're running D.01.04 of SCHEDULR and
don't have this problem. In fact, this is the method we used to test (2)
above. We entered 02/28/00 and it took, entered 02/29/00 and it also
took. Not sure where the problem is here.
Stay on top of Tivoli, we sure are!
Good luck,
Patrick
--
Patrick Santucci
Technical Services Systems Programmer
KVI, a division of Seabury & Smith, Inc.
Visit our site! http://www.kvi-ins.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"If they try to rush me, I always say, 'I've only got
one other speed -- and it's slower.'"    ~ Glenn Ford

ATOM RSS1 RSS2