Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 22 Nov 1998 10:33:00 -0300 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
As far as I know it will not. This being because of the way DBUTIL is
written.
If this is a problem or need, why not use ADAGER which does have the
NBADAGER hook in it. That is you use NBADAGER to accomplish the given task.
Under some conditions where I am performing a high speed erase and writting
the data to a flat file for historical or reload purposes I am using NO-BUFF
IO FORTRAN routines and NETBASE.
The unload and delete is a little faster than SUPRTOOL or other utility, but
when I reload the data I am running usually 35% faster than these utilities.
Thank you
Thomas G. Cook
Roy Brown wrote in message ...
>In article <[log in to unmask]>, THOMAS COOK
><[log in to unmask]> writes
>
>>>James Lagger wrote in message ...
>>>Does anyone have any experience with Quest netbase\shareplex version
>>>9.8? Good, bad, or indifferent?
>
>>We have been using it for some time.
>>There are some enhancements for NFA access and forward shadow access.
>>There is also some resolution in regards to 4gl access via NFA.
>>If you need any specifics please ask.
>
>Can it shadow a DBUTIL ERASE yet?
>--
>Roy Brown Phone : (01684) 291710 Fax : (01684) 291712
>Affirm Ltd Email : [log in to unmask]
>The Great Barn, Mill St 'Have nothing on your systems that you do not
>TEWKESBURY GL20 5SB (UK) know to be useful, or believe to be beautiful.'
|
|
|