 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | [log in to unmask][log in to unmask], 16 Dec 2003 23:05:02 -0800474_iso-8859-1 Yes, that is correct and I believe the most common usage. Recall that HPPATH supports both MPE and POSIX names. Jeff > <---snip---> > > So my question is would the restriction of DISallowing qualified > > user function names be a problem for you, and if so, please give > > me some examples. > > Ouch! So function files would have to be in the current path? > > John Burke > [...]39_16Dec200323:05: [log in to unmask] |
| Date: | Wed, 17 Dec 2003 11:00:10 -0500 |
| Content-Type: | text/plain |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
No not -21.
It is being returned by a DBFIND and displayed. The display field is S9(04) COMP.
Thanks.
--
Leonard S. Berkowitz
Perot Health Care Systems
(Harvard Pilgrim Health Care account)
voice: 617-509-1212
fax: 617-509-1955
pager: 781-226-2431
The information contained in this email message and any attachments
may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended
addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, disclosure, reproduction, distribution
or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply and
delete the message without saving, copying or disclosing it. Thank you.
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|
