Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | F. Alfredo Rego |
Date: | Tue, 31 Aug 2004 08:08:08 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 6:31 -0500 8/31/04, Alan Yeo wrote:
>donna garverick writes
><snip>
...
> >- should sig image include eloquence users and become sig
>>image/eloquence?
>
>Again my personal opinion is that this would be confusing, one product
>is evolving and changing the other isn't.
Not quite. HP is still polishing some important TurboIMAGE
technical details. It all depends on one's definition of
"the RATE of evolving and changing".
>Whilst externally they provide
>the same/very similar functionality, fundamentally they are completely
>different. I think the issues of those staying with TurboImage will be
>different from those who have migrated to Eloquence. As will be the
>response from their Vendors.
Agreed. Alan has certainly identified THESE as the crucial criteria.
_______________
| |
| |
| r | Alfredo http://www.adager.com
| e |
| g | F. Alfredo Rego
| a | Manager, R & D Labs
| d | Adager Corporation
| A | Sun Valley, Idaho 83353-3000 U.S.A.
| |
|_______________|
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|