Denys,

There you go again. You entirely miss the point and set off to mislead and distract.
No, I am not a Saddam supporter and , of course, do not condone his killing his
own people.

But that wasn't the point I was making. The point was that if anyone suggests a
hint of criticism of the justification that Bush used to invade Iraq, either you
try to discredit the source or you ignore it and point fingers in other directions.

Granted it is not a "bad thing" that Saddam is no longer in power in Iraq but the
mess that is there now is hardly a better substitute and what about the daily
death toll?

Finally, you produce a long, rambling "extract" from an Iraqi General(?) who has
obviously been fed the words by Republican writers who uncannily supports all the
decisions made by Bush and his crew in spite of the fact that many of them have
been proved to be based on misleading or misinterpreted data.

Give up Denys.

This really doesn't wash any more and it's getting just a little lame.

I have had enough of this garbage so will not be replying to any further rubbish
that you spout.
(Thank heavens, sighs the rest of the list) :o)

Cheers,

John





---- Message sent via Totalise Webmail - http://www.totalise.co.uk Up to 2Mb Broadband now from just £11.99 a month

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *