Too bad that Dick didn't mention where a conservative has to see it.
Cartoon-network? crystal ball? Fox-News?
Lately I'd say that some conservatives have to asume to belive, cause the
surely couldn't show anybody else. ;-)

Michael



On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 07:26:22 -0600, Denys Beauchemin
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>No, I think Dick has it totally right.  This entire thread proves it.
>
>Denys
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
>Behalf Of fred White
>Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 6:27 AM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT: Improved Security?
>
>On Monday, January 5, 2004, at 09:13 PM, Denys Beauchemin wrote:
>
>> http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/12/30/sprj.irq.alqaeda.weapons/
>>
>> A conservative has to see it to believe it.  A liberal has to believe
>> it
>> to see it.  (Dick Armey)
>>
>> Denys
>
>Excellent article. However, Dick has it backward, at least relative to
>the current definitions of conservative and liberal.
>
>FW
>
>The problems that exist in the world today cannot be solved by the
>level of thinking that created them. - Albert Einstein
>
>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>
>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *