Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 11 Apr 1995 15:03:21 GMT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>The debate is over the Database. They currently own Image &
>Image SQL. The
>In-house guru says that this is not an acceptable solution and
>they need to buy
>Allbase. He says that performance will suck using Image SQL. As
>Allbase is not
>inexpensive, this could really put a crimp in the plans. I would
>really
>appreciate any opinions, comments, etc.
We are using powerbuilder for our next generation of software--
our previous was written in Fortran. We also use Image/SQL.
Powerbuilder will use a run-time Allbase mapping structure to get
to Image/SQL, and this can slow things down. If you just want to
have access to legacy data, then using Image will work fine.
However, if you want to create a whole new application using
Powerbuilder, then Allbase will provide slightly better
performance.
John Painter
--
Computer Solutions, Inc.
Providing Products, Services & Software For HP Business Systems
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|