Laughingly continuing this thread:

Inquiring minds want to know.  Which do you run when you get your BSOD;
Windows NT, 2000 or XP?


Kind regards,

Denys. . .

Denys Beauchemin
HICOMP
(800) 323-8863  (281) 288-7438         Fax: (281) 288-7438
denys at hicomp.com                             www.hicomp.com

-----Original Message-----
From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of
Ted Ashton
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:34 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: OT: Friday Humor

Deny joins in with his own "Friday Humorous" contribution:
> I would point out you have been navigating under a misapprehension.
Whilst
> the HP e3000 is a better, more stable environment that you pay a lot more
> for, Apple and the MacOS do not fit that description.  Indeed, Windows NT,
> 2000 and XP systems are a lot more stable and faster operating systems
than
> Mac OS.  If one brings up OS X, it is my understanding it is a "work in
> progress" and lacks many features.  In time, I am quite sure it will gain
> all the needed features and may even have the stability of NT (2000/XP,)
but
> that day isn't here yet and 2000 has been shipping since 1999.

I agree with Denys on one point.  When he says, "Whilst the HP e3000 is a
better, more stable environment that you pay a lot more for, Apple and the
MacOS do not fit that description," he is exactly right.  Apple prices are
becoming more reasonable :-).

Wanting an OS X box more every time I get a BSOD,
Ted
--
Ted Ashton ([log in to unmask]) | From the Tom Swifty collection:
Southern Adventist University    | "I've made a study of girls", said Tom
Deep thought to be found at      | lassitudinously.
http://www.southern.edu/~ashted  |

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *