I am currently working on a Cobol/View/Image 3K migration to HPUX using
AcuCobol, SP2 thinclient, and Eloquence.
I personally would prefer Linux/Fujitsu Cobol/SP2/Eloquence with
supporting/optional technologies like "C", Java, PHP, Perl, and MySQL
Migration choices really depend on your current HP3000 environment, like
"Cobol/View/Image" being a very common HP-3000 environment, as well as
environments that mostly consist of purchased/canned software. More
variant in-house development environments may require trans-pilers to
convert MPE only languages like SPL, HP basic or Transact, to something
like Cobol "C" or Java.
You could benefit from waiting to migrate if you are not dependent on a
Application Software Vendor and all is running well, using 3rd party
Hardware & OS Software support . Some argue that by saying; "The longer
you wait the less likely it will be to find the expertise to do your
migration." I think there will be less expensive solutions available
down the road, "Independent Contractors" like myself will most likely be
able to do things with less overhead, and maybe even develop user
friendly inexpensive software that will do most of the migration for
you. I've already developed some of these tools for my own tool bag (aka
Flash Memory), they're just not user friendly right now.
Migration plans should include applications built on technology that
will run on any hardware, operating system, database, and one that will
be available for decades to come. Look at technology that stands on it
own, technology that can't be taken out by one choice from one company.
1. Posix/Unix type Operating systems (linux).
2. Hardware that is high quality and generic enough to be updated
easily without needing to repurchase the entire machine.
3. Database's like Postgres, MySQL, Oracale, Eloquence, that will
run on most anything.
4. Compilers/Languages: "C" will be around forever, but NOT a first
choice for application coding. For applications Cobol still fits
into the "Run on any Hardware, and will not be taken out"
category, Java also is a great choice for new development. I would
not rely on any of the "Visual" languages because they seem to tie
you to one IDE.
5. Development Environment (IDE) should also be Language independent
and OS independent.
--
Michael Anderson,
J3k Solutions
Sr.Systems Programmer/Analyst
832.515.3868
Ron Seybold wrote:
> Hello Friends,
>
> I am writing a story for our May issue about the progress and choices
> you've made in migrating off your HP 3000. Can you tell me where you
> have taken the 3000's computing? What's your schedule?
>
> If you can include a note or two about why, or how the migration is
> going -- like if you plan to finish by the end of this year -- I'd
> really appreciate it.
>
> Thanks for the help. Even an answer of "HP-UX" or "Windows" or another
> environment will really tell me a lot.
>
> Best of luck to all of you,
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|