HP3000-L Archives

September 2006, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Setree, Wesley" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Setree, Wesley
Date:
Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:34:50 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (72 lines)
Here's what it looks like this morning....

TUE, SEP 26, 2006,  7:30:27 AM
 Item  Subsystem   Name   G/N  Description      Used   High    Max
____________________________________________________________________

  1    NS XPORT  CP_POOL_ (G)  Control Buf Pool    0      1    300 :)
  2    NS XPORT  1536___L (G)  Inbound Buf Pool  169    170    170 :(
  3    NS XPORT  LOOP____ (N)  Outbnd  Buf Pool    0      0    128 :)
  4    NS XPORT  LAN1____ (N)  Outbnd  Buf Pool    0     25    128 :)
  5    NS XPORT  UDP      (G)  GProt  Msg  Pool   50    N/A    512 :)
  6    NS XPORT  PXP      (G)  GProt  Msg  Pool    1    N/A    660 :)
  7    NS XPORT  PROBE    (G)  CM Prot Msg Pool    1    N/A    677 :)
  8    NS XPORT  IP_NI    (G)  IP-NI  Msg  Pool   50    N/A   2048 :)
  9    NS XPORT  IP_NI    (G)  IP-NI  Msg  Pool   90    N/A   2048 :)
 10    NS XPORT           (G)  Node  Name Cache    0     48    360 :)
 11    NS XPORT           (G)  TCP Control pool    0     15   2048 :)

#2 was full a few minutes ago, then it came back down. Our network guy was
able to see lost packets on the network when it was maxed out. Is it
possible that this number could fill up and not come back down? Right now,
it's moving up and down as users are logging on and off. Can this number be
increased?

Wes

-----Original Message-----
From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of James Hofmeister
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 10:57 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [HP3000-L] Network instability


Hello Steve,

>> We use a name to log on and when this occurs we get close to
>> 30% packet loss, using ping from a network user's pc. No 
>> other network issues are reported, so all the problems 
>> "seem" to be between the HP3000 and the network switch.

Where to start:
1- linkcontrol @;status=all 
2- nettool;info="res;di;quit"
3- nmlg files

Regards,
James Hofmeister
Hewlett Packard - Global Solutions Engineering (WTEC)
P.S. My Ideals are my own, not necessarily my employers.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *


-----------------------------------------------------
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission 
may contain confidential or legally privileged 
information that is intended only for the individual 
or entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
any disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance 
upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. 

If you have received this e-mail transmission in error, 
please reply to the sender, so that we can arrange 
for proper delivery, and then please delete the message 
from your inbox. Thank you.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2