Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 10 Feb 2003 09:17:34 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 08:30:30PM -0700, fred White wrote:
> On Friday, February 7, 2003, at 06:15 PM, Ken Hirsch wrote:
>
> > If the odds of a catastrophic failure of a shuttle misson are 2 out of
> > 113 (1.8%),
> > this is about as dangerous as 1200 recreational skydiving jumps. But
> > it's fairly
> > safe compared to a WWII bombing mission.
>
> Except for the "colateral damage" on the ground when the Elona Gay
> dumped its load.
I think you meant "Enola Gay," but I suspect we all knew that wasn't the
important part of your message. :-)
Dave
--
+----------------David Oksner-----http://www.case.net/-----------------+
|Life would be so much easier if we could just look at the source code.|
[log in to unmask]
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|