HP3000-L Archives

March 1996, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nick Demos <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Nick Demos <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 12 Mar 1996 12:18:54 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
----------
From:   Peter Sima[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent:   Sunday, March 10, 1996 4:38 PM
To:     Multiple recipients of list HP3000-L
Subject:        Re: C++ Compiler for MPE?
 
Jeanette Nutsford ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
 
: I am just curious Peter.  What were the reasons for moving from COBOL =
to C
: (C++).
 
 
I see two problems with C++ for commercial applictions:
 
1.  Not as easy for the non-original-coder to follow the program logic.
 
2.  C++ is SOOO flexible that it can be taylored to the coder's style =
and idiosyncracies which makes it even harder for someone else to follow =
and maintain the program.
 
In summary - not as easily maintained, which I consider VERY important.
 
Nick

ATOM RSS1 RSS2