They might know where they are from sympathizers, but the only light they
will see is from a ground flare booby trap.
Heat signatures from the site are negligible, noise levels are at pin-drop.
Radar is scattered, radio communications are receive only.
Guy Avenell
www.hpto.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Lee" <[log in to unmask]>
To: "Guy Avenell" <[log in to unmask]>; <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: Re: [HP3000-L] OT : US uses Indian 'threat' to force Pak
support on Iraq
> Guy-
>
> Thanks for the clarification. And these ground forces that pinpoint
> locations may well have to fight their way to the location, is that
> correct? I don't imagine they will "leave the light on" for them?
>
> John Lee
>
>
> At 02:33 PM 3/10/03 -0800, Guy Avenell wrote:
> >John,
> >
> >It's more of a dismember project, than it is a disarmament. First you
have
> >to find the mobile weapons, which can be launched from trucks or trains.
> >Then you need enough explosives to put them out of commission. These are
> >hard to locate, target, and destroy. I was in the Ground Launched Cruise
> >Missile (GLCM) program in Europe. It took ground forces to pin-point our
> >location.
> >The ones in hardened facilities just need a weapon that will penetrate
the
> >concrete and still explode the warhead.
> >
> >Guy Avenell
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "John Lee" <[log in to unmask]>
> >To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 12:15 PM
> >Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT : US uses Indian 'threat' to force Pak support
on
> >Iraq
> >
> >
> >> I would argue that with the technology available to terrorist
> >> nations/organizations, this mobile fighting force is necessary. Once a
> >> missile is launched at us, we have to be able to instantly react and go
> >> disarm the next ones before they get launched.
> >>
> >> John Lee
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> At 01:46 PM 3/10/03 EST, Wirt Atmar wrote:
> >> >
> >> >However, over the same interim, I would estimate (without looking any
> >numbers
> >> >up) that the US has spent more than $8.5 trillion dollars on weapons
> >> >development and the maintenance of a go-anywhere, fight-any-battle
> >military.
> >> >
> >> >Wirt Atmar
> >> >
> >> >* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> >> >* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> >> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
