Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 18 Jul 1997 05:01:36 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear readers,
Clues sought to the black arts of 3000 performance tuning.
The queues on our 957 running approx 50 sessions and a handful
of batch processes is as follows. In general we use CQ for
true OLTP applications, DQ for batch jobs and EQ for online users
with cpu hungry applications. (Mainly to protect our CQ users)
We are increasing the number of hungry users all of the time and
I have noticed that in some circumstances STORE type operations
will grind to a complete halt with our current set up.
I need a compromise solution that will enable my online users
to get sensible response times from their online reports but
at the same time protects my high volume, low CPU OLTP users and
my background operations type tasks (stores and the like).
I know that this is very limited information to go on but
will be happy to post more details if you can suggest solutions
which work for you!
------QUANTUM-------
QUEUE BASE LIMIT MIN MAX ACTUAL BOOST TIMESLICE
----- ---- ----- --- --- ------ ----- ---------
CQ 152 200 1 2000 18 DECAY 200
DQ 202 238 2000 2000 2000 DECAY 200
EQ 160 238 1 200 25 DECAY 200
I have tried oscillating the DQ and EQ but it seemed to make
things worse (fast performance for a period then nothing
for several seconds)
All suggestions welcomed.
Thanks in advance
David Randall, IT Manager, Healthcall Services Limited
401 South Row, Milton Keynes, Bucks.. MK9 2PH http:\\www.healthcall.co.uk
Voice +1908 691919 Fax : +1908 690169 mailto:\\[log in to unmask]
|
|
|