"Erik Vistica" <[log in to unmask]> wrote in message
news:3CF7DBAA.20805@hp.com...
> Michael Baier wrote:
>
>
> >
> > And God's name could be
> > God
> > Allah
> > Buddah
> > Jesus
> > or anything else.
>
> Not so.
>
> Act 4:12   Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none
> other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.
>
> Act 4:13   Now when they saw the boldness of Peter and John, and
> perceived that they were unlearned and ignorant men, they marvelled; and
> they took knowledge of them, that they had been with Jesus.
>
> Act 4:14   And beholding the man which was healed standing with them,
> they could say nothing against it.

Therein lies the root of the problem - they don't believe that JC was
anything more than just a plain ole vanilla prophet on the same level as
Moses - or Mohammed. These statements are rejected by them because how can
one plain ole vanilla prophet have an advantage over another?

Your statements are just so much white noise to them - they discount them as
irrelevant.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *