The problem of small XM buffer has been addressed. Now there is a large
and configurable XM buffer, and is capable of supporting large
transactions. This solution has gone out with MPE 6.5. I am also
interested in knowing the specifics of  any other dynamic rollback
problem.

Regards,
Vikram

Steve Dirickson wrote:

> > IMO HP appears to treat the dynamic rollback problem more like
> > a DBMS limitation than a bug.
>
> Pardon my ignorance: what "dynamic rollback problem" are we talking
> about? The XM buffer overflow is a defect in MPE, not in the DBMS, so
> I assume this refers to something else?
>
> Steve