HP3000-L Archives

July 1998, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Trudeau, James L" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Trudeau, James L
Date:
Wed, 1 Jul 1998 06:58:20 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Howdy,

I've been and still am roaming about the net to come up with some
"authoritative" documentation about leap day in the year 2000.  Some
time ago there was quite an extensive thread on the list dealing
with this and other Y2K issues.  I've checked the archives - lot of
good stuff but nothing that management here considers "authoritative".

What the devil do they want, some admiral from the Naval Observatory
to come on down for tacos and a chat?  I sort of understand their
problem, as someone has dumped a bunch of documents from
several sources on my desk.  Half of them "prove" that the year
2000 is a leap year.  The other half "prove" that the year 2000
is not a leap year.  Who's in charge here?

Perhaps I will find enlightenment in one of our nearby crystal clear
sparkling ponds.

Jim (still hasn't) Trudeau

ATOM RSS1 RSS2