Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 13 May 2004 12:37:01 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
--- John MacLerran <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> By trial and error, I've discovered that the current raw
> configuration of the array yields about 165GB (in RAID 1/0, which is
> how we'll use it, because we don't want the RAID5 write performance
> hit).
uh....i don't think you need to worry about running raid 5. that's how
my va is configured (a bunch of 73gb drives...and one is the hot spare
for the whole array). the autoraid (12h) units are what gained the
imfamous reputation for raid 5 problems. - d
=====
Donna Garverick Sr. System Programmer
dgarverick -at- longs -dot- com
925-210-6631 Longs Drug Stores
Come, my friends, 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world.
Tho' much is taken, much abides; and tho'
We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are.
"Ulysses", A. Tennyson
>>>MY opinions, not Longs Drug Stores'<<<
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - Buy advance tickets for 'Shrek 2'
http://movies.yahoo.com/showtimes/movie?mid=1808405861
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|