Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 25 Jan 2000 09:31:32 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
"James Clark,Florida" wrote:
> I would agree to the below sentiment for only long CPU intensive processes.
> But for many normal processes, taking into consideration I/O, memory, and
> having to battle other processes, more CPU's will accelerate the process.
> I/O can now be handled by another CPU, and system housekeeping, etc. Of
> course, you will not see 1 cpu 100%, 2 cpu 50%, etc. type of speed up as I
> would interpret what is said below, but you should see some improvement, and
> depending upon your workload that improvement can be substantial.
james makes a very good point. sometime ago, there was some discussion here
about adding another processor to our 995/300. our hp se pointed out that we
*might* see a 10-15% performance gain if we did that. he explained it this way
-- you can pretty much assume that one processor will be doing nothing than
trying to manage the other three <sigh> - d
--
Donna Garverick Sr. System Programmer
925-210-6631 [log in to unmask]
>>>MY opinions, not Longs Drug Stores'<<<
|
|
|