HP3000-L Archives

January 2002, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Dirickson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Steve Dirickson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 05:40:07 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
> Who says Michael is speaking of Aleph-null,

No one; it's a reasonable assumption from the stated operations. But
feel free to choose a higher cardinality.

> he did not mention that we
> were dealing with integers. Aleph-null is to me
> the quantity of all possible integers.

Pretty much; by Cantor's definition, it's the size of the set of all
natural numbers. But since "all integers", "all even integers", "all
natural numbers evenly divisible by 42", etc. all have the same
cardinality, the distinction is sans difference.

> In real number theory there are
> more reals than integers, so there are more projections on
> infinity.

Sure; as mentioned, pick whatever cardinality you like. I just picked
the one that is most commonly associated with the term "infinity".

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2