HP3000-L Archives

December 1997, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wolfgang Kinscher <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
[log in to unmask][log in to unmask], 4 Dec 1997 08:52:57 -0600752_us-ascii Some 'duh'-type headlines:

>
> Firm Grasp of the Obvious Department
> >From the Notebook pages of The New Republic 1995:
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Study Finds Sex, Pregnancy Link
> Cornell Daily Sun, December 7, 1995
>
> Survey Finds Dirtier Subways After Cleaning Jobs Were Cut
> The New York Times, November 22
>
> Larger Kangaroos Leap Farther, Researchers Find
> The Los Angeles Times, November 2
>
> 'Light' meals are lower in fat, calories
> Huntington Herald-Dispatch, November 30
>
> Alcohol ads promote drinking
> The Hartford Courant, November 18
>
> Malls try [...]47_4Dec199708:52:[log in to unmask]
Date:
Tue, 2 Dec 1997 16:27:49 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
RE: (95 lines)
)Hi Wolfgang,     *12/2/97*
)
)Thanks for your response to the problems I had installing Express-3
)using Patch/iX, where "enhancements" like ODBCLINK/SE DO NOT
)Automatically Qualify for installation.
)
)How about an enhancement to Patch/iX that asks you the following
)question when you hit the "QUALIFY" button:
)
)"Would you like to Auto-Qualify all ENHANCEMENT PATCHES,
) rather than have to 'force' them manually?  Typically you might
) want this option when installing an "Express-x" Powerpatch."
)
)If you answer YES to this option, Patch/iX would Auto-Qualify
)any "enhancement" patch that is safe to install on your system.
)

Good idea and a valuable feedback for Scott McClellan.

Another way to solve the conflict qualify enhancement patches
automatically or not, would be to implement a 'qualify enhancement
patches'-Switch, which is specified at Patch/iX start and
defines the method of qualifying enhancement patches.

)The way things are now, an awful lot of people are going to have
)trouble going thru the Patch/iX Qualification screen patch-by-patch,
)going to the detail screen for each one to see if it says "enhancements
)must be forced", and "forcing" them manually, forever nervous that
)they're going to make some sort of mistake and force the wrong thing.
)By the way, the documentation page you referred to named "Software
)Products and Dependent Patches" DOES NOT tell you which ones
)are ENHANCEMENTS.   I believe that the Patch/iX could be improved
)as suggested above to make it easier to properly install EXPRESS
)releases.
)
)Jack Gaddy, Data Proc. Mgr.
)King & Prince Seafood Corp.
)100 Lanier Blvd.
)Brunswick, GA. 31520-8603
)Ph:  912-265-5155 x470
)[log in to unmask]
)
)
)-----Original Message-----
)From: [log in to unmask] [SMTP:WOLFGANG_KINSCHER@HP-Aust
)ria-om1.om.hp.com]
)Sent: Monday, December 01, 1997 1:45 PM
)To: [log in to unmask]
)Cc: [log in to unmask]
)Subject: Patch/iX problems with 5.5 Express-3
)
))The HPRC just told me there's a known problem with Patch/iX NOT
))properly qualifying all Mpe/iX 5.5 EXPRESS-3 patches.   I had noticed
))that several Patches did not install, but didn't really know that a Patch/iX
))bug was involved.
)
)sorry, but no Patch/iX bug is involved.
)'Read Before Installing' delivered with MPE/iX 5.5 Express 3
)contains on Page 13 - Product Tables and Dependent Patches
)following Note:
)---------------------------------------------
)Enhancement patches are included in this PowerPatch. These patches will not
)qualify for automatic installation. To install these patches with
)HP Patch/iX, they will need to be "forced" on. The following patch tables
)document all the patches included in this PowerPatch.
)Using Patch/iX will indicate which patch automatically qualify for
)installation on your system.
)---------------------------------------------
)MPE/iX 5.5 Express 3 enhancement patches are:
)
)ATCJXQ6, COBJXW6, MPEJXR6, ODIJXJ0, OFDJXK5,
)SQLJXR2, TIXJXU4
)and dependent patches (not qualifying) are:
)MPEJXL8, VGFEDQ9.
)
)the key patch for ODBCLINK/SE
))(SQLJXR2B) DID NOT INSTALL, so I really don't have ODBCLINK!   Also,
))MPEJXR6C (the new Listf,ACCESS feature) DID NOT INSTALL - one HPRC
))guy said that this was OK because the LISTF,ACCESS feature "didn't
))make it into Express-3" (even though it's in the Exp-3 Communicator?!! -
))can some verify this for me?).   I've got another call into HPRC to help
))me go back thru all the Patch/iX "Non-Qualified's" to figure out which
))others ones s/b "Force Installed".   Just wanted everybody to be aware
))of the problem - I wish I had known, because this Patch/iX process, as
))nice as it is conceptually, is time-consuming and not something I look
))forward to doing again for no reason.   Anyone else have this happen to
))them???
))
))Jack Gaddy, Data Proc. Mgr.
))King & Prince Seafood Corp.
))100 Lanier Blvd.
))Brunswick, GA. 31520-8603
))Ph:  912-265-5155 x470
))[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2