HP3000-L Archives

February 2001, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Wayne R. Boyer" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 00:53:29 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Oh but HP has not yet even commited to upgrading COBOL-II/iX to comply with
the new COBOL standard.  It would be nice if they did that (soon) as COBOL is
the dominant language on MPE/iX and is it a nice idea to comply with
internationaly accepted standards.

A considerable lobbying effort needs to get directed at HP on this subject.
I suspect that most HP-3000 COBOL programmers are either a) not aware of the
pending standard change or b) not aware of HP's head-in-the-sand approach to
this.

It might even be smart for HP to incorporate the IA-64 syntax changes
(CALLALLIGNED64, etc?) into the PA-RISC compiler so we can have identical
source code in the future for both PA-RISC and IA-64.

Wayne Boyer
Department of Wishfull Thinking
Cal-Logic

ATOM RSS1 RSS2