HP3000-L Archives

February 1995, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Rich Trapp <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 Feb 1995 08:43:25 MST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
john brainard <[log in to unmask]> writes:
 
>
> Hello all,
>
> I am currently working with a large application on MPE 5.0 (50.40 and 50.50).
> It is a mixture of C (40K lines), COBOL (60K lines), and some database code.
> We are noticing a huge difference in performance between our HPUX
> machine and our MPE machine.
>
> Anyone willing to make guesses to the cause of the performance problem?
> Anyone with similar stories, or possibly fixes?
>
> John Brainard
> --
>
> John Brainard
>      [log in to unmask]
>
 
John,
   You didn't say which was faster or slower.  What database are you using?
Is the CPU time spent in the code the difference, or is it the performance
of the database retrievals?  Are the CPU's rated for the same number of users?
Rich
--
______________________________________________________________________
________ Dynamic Information Systems Corp.   |
\!DISC / Rich Trapp                          | My opinions are my own.
 \    /  OMNIDEX Product Manager - IMAGE/SQL | With any luck they're
  \  /   Phone : 303 444-4000                | correct ;-)
   \/    E-mail: [log in to unmask]                |
----------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2