Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Johnson, Tracy |
Date: | Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:48:34 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> From: Chris Bartram [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>
> HP-3000 Systems Discussion wrote:
> > Speaking of throttling on HP3000's, can anyone tell me why
> traditional
> > Reflection file transfer is so gawdawful slow?
> >
> > I knew there was a reason for it, I just can't remember.
>
> Sure.
>
> A "regular" reflection transfer is operating over the
> terminal interface. Reflection is capturing data sent over a
> terminal connection; which means 1) the data has to be
> cleaned/encoded so no unfortunate/unexpected connection
> interruptions occur (control-y/q/f/esc/etc.) and 2) data
> transfers are limited to terminal device recsizes (80/132/256
> bytes per line, with appropriate required flow controls).
> That's a lot of extra overhead; one read operation per record.
>
> The "fast" file transfers open a separate tcp/ip port and
> simply blast the data across the network un-encoded and
> without any extra flow controls -beside those built into
> TCP/IP). Very similar to FTP file transfers.
>
> -Chris Bartram
Ahhh, that makes sense, thanks!
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|