HP3000-L Archives

February 2008, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Johnson, Tracy" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Johnson, Tracy
Date:
Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:48:34 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
> From: Chris Bartram [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
> 
> HP-3000 Systems Discussion wrote:
> > Speaking of throttling on HP3000's, can anyone tell me why 
> traditional 
> > Reflection file transfer is so gawdawful slow?
> > 
> > I knew there was a reason for it, I just can't remember.
> 
> Sure.
> 
> A "regular" reflection transfer is operating over the 
> terminal interface. Reflection is capturing data sent over a 
> terminal connection; which means 1) the data has to be 
> cleaned/encoded so no unfortunate/unexpected connection 
> interruptions occur (control-y/q/f/esc/etc.) and 2) data 
> transfers are limited to terminal device recsizes (80/132/256 
> bytes per line, with appropriate required flow controls). 
> That's a lot of extra overhead; one read operation per record.
> 
> The "fast" file transfers open a separate tcp/ip port and 
> simply blast the data across the network un-encoded and 
> without any extra flow controls -beside those built into 
> TCP/IP). Very similar to FTP file transfers.
> 
> -Chris Bartram

Ahhh, that makes sense, thanks!

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2